Communiqué Issued at the Lagos Public presentation of PWDs Charter on Elections
Communiqué
Issued at the Lagos Public presentation of PWDs Charter on Elections
Held on Tuesday, September 26th,
2017 by the International Press Centre (IPC) Lagos under the
Strengthening Citizens Engagement in Electoral Process (SCEEP) project, being
implemented in Lagos by IPC and supported by ACTIONAID Nigeria and the UKAID
through the Department for International Development (DFID).
THE COMMUNIQUÉ
Introduction
Following emerging issues on the
need to advance the rights of People With Disabilities (PWDs) to actively
participate in elections and positively engage the electoral process, the
International Press Centre (IPC) held a one-day
forum and public presentation of a draft document of PWDs Charter on Elections in Nigeria. The programme, which held
on
Tuesday, September 26th, 2017 at All Seasons Conference Centre,
Agidingbi, Ikeja, Lagos State is part of activities being funded under the
Strengthening Citizens Engagement in Electoral Process (SCEEP) project, being
implemented in Lagos by IPC and supported by ACTIONAID Nigeria and the UKAID
through the Department for International Development (DFID).
The event which was aimed at bringing
to public domain, highlights of key issues in the PWDs charter on elections as
well as accommodate stakeholders’ contribution on implementation strategies for
the southwest zone. It had about 85 participants drawn from
the PWDs group entailing the hearing impaired, the visually impaired,
the physically challenged, the Albinos as well as
representatives of institutional stakeholders including the National
Orientation Agency (NOA), the
Independent Electoral Commission (INEC), CSO stakeholders, youth, women and the
media.
Programme
Objective
The objective of the programme was aimed
facilitating
joint actions of the PWDs community in having a more inclusive participation in
elections in Nigeria.
Messages, remarks & presentations
The
highlights of the charter were presented by Dr. Dele Seteolu of the Department of Political
Science, Lagos State University (LASU) while goodwill remarks werereceived from
Mr.
Waheed Ishola, Lagos Director of the NOA; Mr. Olufemi Akinbiyi, an assistant
Director, Publicity/Protocol from INEC; Representatives of ActionAid
Nigeria/BBC media team and members of the PWD Community.
In
his goodwill message, INEC’s representative, Mr. Olufemi Akinbiyi said peoples
with disabilities are key to the success of INEC activities given their
population of close to 25 million people. He noted that for PWDs to explore
their importance and to demand their rights from the politicians, the first and
the most significant step to take was to undergo voter registration. He
therefore urged people with disabilities to register and vote people they can
trust. He added that priority voting for PWDs has been introduced during
elections to ensure that PWDs are assisted to easily vote during elections.
Also, in his goodwill message, Mr. Waheed Ishola, Lagos
State Director of the NOA expressed his organization’s readiness to support
PWDs and other stakeholders to make sure their rights were not infringed upon.
In his words, “the National Orientation Agency is your friend and will link you
up with other government agencies. Just make sure you put yourselves together
with one voice and not be fragmented”. Commenting on the PWDs charter, he said the
PWDs charter on elections would ensure that government reckons with and provides
good environment that would drive their demands. Mr. Ishola, who also noted
that disability was not the end of any person, urged PWDs to get registered so that
they could have a say during election, using their strength and numbers. He
thereby encouraged them to not just vote for people they can trust, but also
aspire for any political position of their choice.
Overview/highlights of
the challenges affecting the participation of PWDs in elections in Nigeria:
In
his presentation of the overview of challenges affecting PWDs participation in
elections, Dr. Dele Seteolu outlined the challenges of PWDs as
captured in the charter under five PWDs cluster groups as follows:
·
Women with Disability
-
Women
with Disabilities (WWD) have, for long, been experiencing a broad range of
roadblocks to the exercise of their right to vote in Nigeria.
-
Most
WWD face extreme difficulties that did not necessarily result in obtaining their
voters cards such as passing through long queues and going back and forth for
several weeks before acquiring voter’s cards, the non-recognition of their
disability conditions by INEC officials during the voting process and the
frequent breakout of sporadic violence.
-
Circumstantial
denials of voting rights to WWD have also featured from one voting cycle to the
other. These have mainly manifested at INEC and other voters insistence that
WWDs join the queue which physically challenged women could not withstand and
failure to provide guides for the blind and deaf.
-
WWD
do not belong to political parties because of the physical demands that
frequent meetings and traveling for political activities exert on people.
-
Political
parties have traditionally marginalized women in Nigeria, which discourages WWD
from attempting to participate in them. Therefore, they prefer to confine their
roles to voting at election, which has unfortunately remained a source of
relative deprivation in Nigeria.
·
People with Physical Challenges
-
Physically
challenged persons face discrimination during elections that emanate both from
the poor supervision of the electoral process and fellow voters. Central to
these were the late arrival of INEC officials to polling stations (PS) amid the
glaring absence of required attention to conditions of the physically
challenged.
-
In
the absence of specially designated areas, many PWDs were stigmatized doing
voter registration and during the actual voting at the 2015 elections.
-
The
security provided at election venues did not pay attention to PWDs, even when
they had verbal exchanges with able bodied voters.
-
Political
parties did not fulfill their campaign promises, particularly of presenting
some PWDs for elections.
·
People with Albinism
-
Historically,
People With Albinism (PWAs) have been dissatisfied with the ways elections have
been used to disenfranchise members of their cluster in Nigeria. For example,
using the 2015 general elections as benchmark, some of the PWDs in this cluster
acknowledged that though it “was fair and peaceful on a general note,” most of
them could not exercise their rights to vote immediately on arrival as earlier
promised. Without a guide and a place to shade them, as they waited to vote,
the only option was to leave to avoid sun burns to their skins resulting from
prolonged exposure to the sun.
-
Also,
most of them were frustrated that the available materials for voter
“information and education” were usually not presented in colours that they
could easily comprehend.
·
People with Visual Impairment
-
People
with Visual Impairment (VIs) confirmed that some of their voters’ cards were
stamped. However, special queues were not formed for this PWD cluster in spite of
the fact that they were a people “who could not see.”
-
In
addition to that, brailed ballot papers were not available for them to make
independent choices of candidates they wished to vote at the elections.
Moreover, INEC officials at the Polling Stations (PSs) practically prevented
the trusted guides that brought them from assisting them to cast their votes.
Instead, the INEC officials “assigned members of the security forces, whom they
did not trust, to guide them to cast their votes. In other words, they were
denied the secret ballot quality of the voting process and they were not
listened to “when they needed INEC officials’ attention”. –Also, despite
repeated pleas, “INEC and the political parties did not provide written or
other forms of necessary information for People with Visual Impairment (VIs) to
have access to voting materials”. For instance, there was “no advertisement …
on the available media about
political activities for the
generality of PWDs.
·
People with Leprosy Cases
-
There
was unrestrained “stigmatization” which made it extremely difficult for members
of this PWD cluster to form a queue during elections.
-
It
was evident that INEC did not expect this cluster to participate in the
elections because “no specialist was
provided to meet our exceptional needs.” Thus, they were unable to register as
voters “since the card readers could not capture fingertips” while neither INEC
and the political parties bothered about the situation.
-
In
the same vein, they observed that INEC “had never made mention of PWL in an
advertisement on print and electronic media.” Also, they and their
representatives had never been invited to participate in meetings to ascertain
and integrate their special needs into the electoral process.
·
Persons with Hearing Impairment
-
INEC
has consistently failed to provide a key means of communication with PWHI
during elections in Nigeria. In their own words, “we were not provided any sign
language interpreter before or during the last elections.” Similarly, they
reported that both INEC and the political parties have never paid any special
attention to them during elections in this country. Coupled with that was the
consistent late arrival of INEC officials with the ballot boxes to polling
units, which caused many of them to leave out of anger and frustration.
Highlight of Demands by PWDs in the
Charter on elections
·
Women with Disabilities (WWD)
demanded that:
a.
Special
voting centres should be established close to them during general elections in
Nigeria.
b.
Able
bodied voters should be sensitized to stop discriminating against WWDs.
c.
Voters
should be well protected and electoral violence totally curtailed.
d.
Political
parties should accept, recognize and involve women in all their activities.
e.
Civil
society organizations should make deliberate efforts to support WWDs,
particularly the graduates among them to gainful employment.
f.
INEC
should work with WWDs during elections
·
People with Albinism demanded that:
a.
INEC
should conduct research on how to make polling stations friendlier with a view
to providing people with albinism with the best voter experience.
b.
INEC
and the political parties should consult members of this cluster for advice on
colours that are appropriate for the design of voting materials and party logos
respectively to enhance access to voter information.
·
People with Visual Impairment
demanded that:
a.
INEC
should ensure that braille ballot papers are provided for this cluster during
elections. The braille materials can then be deployed to several other
locations within a local government area (LGA) for members of this cluster to vote
once for all available offices namely; State Houses of Assembly, House of
Representatives, the Senate and the President, etc,.
b.
INEC
and political parties should design special voter education for the visually
impaired.
People
with Leprosy demanded that:
c.
INEC
should provide this cluster with specialized ballot boxes or equipment to
capture their votes
i.
INEC
should employ qualified PWDs and saddle them with the tasks of ensuring the
participation of this constituency in the political processes and in electoral
preparatory process. They could also serve as election observers and be
involved in the mobilization of PWDs to participate in elections.
ii.
INEC
and the political parties should develop clear and simplified voting guidelines
for PWDs: braille for the visually impaired, audios for the blind and
television-based sign language for the deaf. PWDs should be engaged to perform
these roles.
iii.
INEC
should ensure that polling stations are visible and accessible to all PWDs.
iv.
INEC
should ensure that the names of all registered PWDs are verified on the voters’
registers and printed in bold for easy identification during elections.
v.
INEC
should endeavor to make the voting process easier by sorting out their
logistics issues to ensure prompt arrival to the polling stations with voting
materials on election days.
vi.
INEC
should, before the elections, sensitize its staff that they will encounter PWD
and prepare them for the type of voting-related challenges they might have to
help them surmount. There are skilled PWDs that INEC could use as facilitators
for such sensitization.
vii.
Political
Parties should ensure that PWDs are appointed into their administrative
structures and offered opportunities to contest and be voted for on their
platforms.
viii.
Political
parties should include members of all PWD clusters in their campaign teams for
elections.
ix.
Workshops
should be organized regularly to enlighten the government, political parties
and relevant stakeholders on strategies for integrating PWDs into the electoral
processes of Nigeria.
x.
INEC
should as a matter of urgency ensure the amendment of section 56 of the
Electoral Act 2015 to include individuals with other forms of disability.
xi.
INEC
should ensure that all categories of PWDs are always contacted for their
contributions before changes to the electoral processes are effected before and
during elections.
xii.
INEC
should convene workshops for a review of the electoral provisions to further
respond to the needs of PWDs as the need arises.
xiii.
INEC
should provide for the nature of disability on the voter registration cards of
PWDs.
xiv.
INEC
should ensure that PWDs are not charged any form of fees to register with
political parties and be eligible for elections.
xv.
Security
agencies should ensure the protection of voters at polling stations, especially
for PWDs.
xvi.
Security
agencies should not allow themselves to be used to harass and intimidate PWDs.
Conclusion/End
Notes:
The
PWDs in the programme had syndicate sessions to draw out strategies in advancing
the key highlights of the charter. They also expressed gratitude to IPC and its
partners; ACTIONAID and UKAID through the Department for International
Development (DFID) for supporting the PWDs n developing the charter and in
organizing the forum.
Signed:
Lanre
Arogundade
Director
International Press Centre (IPC),
Lagos, Nigeria
IPC is Nigeria's foremost media capacity development organization.
Comments
Post a Comment